Comments on: UMG v. Augusto: Who really owns the copy? http://interactionlaw.com/wordpress/2007/08/10/umg-v-augusto-who-really-owns-the-copy/ Competition, Copyright and Freedom of Expression Sun, 05 Feb 2012 00:21:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2 Comment on UMG v. Augusto: Who really owns the copy? by: CopyOwner » Blog Archive » Ninth Circuit Gets Used CDs Right http://interactionlaw.com/wordpress/2007/08/10/umg-v-augusto-who-really-owns-the-copy/#comment-3148 Wed, 05 Jan 2011 01:25:08 +0000 http://interactionlaw.com/wordpress/2007/08/10/umg-v-augusto-who-really-owns-the-copy/#comment-3148 [...] In a case we had been watching for some time (UMG v. Augusto), the Ninth Circuit finally upheld the district court’s holding that self-serving restrictions placed on so-called “promotional” CDs could not limit the right of the owner of the CD to sell it without permission. [...] […] In a case we had been watching for some time (UMG v. Augusto), the Ninth Circuit finally upheld the district court’s holding that self-serving restrictions placed on so-called “promotional” CDs could not limit the right of the owner of the CD to sell it without permission. […]

]]> Comment on UMG v. Augusto: Who really owns the copy? by: CopyOwner » Blog Archive » Owner of Legal Software Can Sell on eBay http://interactionlaw.com/wordpress/2007/08/10/umg-v-augusto-who-really-owns-the-copy/#comment-2928 Thu, 22 May 2008 05:00:48 +0000 http://interactionlaw.com/wordpress/2007/08/10/umg-v-augusto-who-really-owns-the-copy/#comment-2928 [...] The court correctly focused on whether the indicia of ownership were present rather than whether the copyright owner called it a license. This is the very course I argue the court in UMG v. Augusto should follow, where a record company tried to trump an Act of Congress by stamping “not for resale” on the copy Congress authorized to be resold. [...] […] The court correctly focused on whether the indicia of ownership were present rather than whether the copyright owner called it a license. This is the very course I argue the court in UMG v. Augusto should follow, where a record company tried to trump an Act of Congress by stamping “not for resale” on the copy Congress authorized to be resold. […]

]]> Comment on UMG v. Augusto: Who really owns the copy? by: dispatches from TJICistan » Blog Archive » if property is socially constructed, then it all comes down to who maintains the registry of titles...and who does maintain a registry of titles to CDs that are handed out on street corners? http://interactionlaw.com/wordpress/2007/08/10/umg-v-augusto-who-really-owns-the-copy/#comment-2843 Wed, 15 Aug 2007 00:37:17 +0000 http://interactionlaw.com/wordpress/2007/08/10/umg-v-augusto-who-really-owns-the-copy/#comment-2843 [...] http://interactionlaw.com/wordpress/2007… [...] […] http://interactionlaw.com/wordpress/2007… […]

]]>